Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

For other car-related discussions not covered in other sections.

Moderators: scimjim, Roger Pennington, philhoward, Lukeyboy46, erikscimitardemon, Terry Rickard

Post Reply
User avatar
TrevorG
RSSOC Member
Posts: 479
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:09 am
Location: Thomas chapel in Pembrokeshire
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 25 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by TrevorG » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:59 pm

Just spent a fair bit of today renovating a 1956 international tractor brakes and thought it worth a mention that here is an agri vehicle with in-board disk brakes. Made me wonder why the car industry didn't catch onto this earlier? Admittedly, they are operated by concentric steel plates with ball bearings running in grooves, but the simplicity of dismantling without major surgery is to be congratulated. Also, there are two double sided circular friction plates on each side, so the stopping power is massive (when friction material renewed!).



User avatar
scimjim
RSSOC Member
Posts: 38146
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:08 pm
Location: Gloucester
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 1007 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by scimjim » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:09 pm

Jag had inboard discs in the 60s didn’t they? And the Rover P6 in the mid 60s. Racecars had them earlier I think, to reduce unstrung weight.

The Citroen SM has them on the front!!!


Jim King

SECURE DRY STORAGE FOR YOUR SCIMITAR

Current: SE5 (8Ball), TI SS1 (snotty), 1600 SS1 (G97), 1600 SS1 (C686CCR), 2.5TD SE5a (diesel 5a), 6 x random other SS1s.
Previous: SE5, 3 x SE5a, 2 x SE6a, 3 x SE6b, GTC, 2.9i GTC, 3 x 1600 SS1, 1300 SS1, Mk1 Ti Sabre, Mk1.5 CVH Sabre
Chief mechanic for: 1400 K series SS1 (Megan3), 1400 CVH EFi SS1 (Grawpy), 1300 SS1 (Number One) & Sarah's coupe.
CURE THE FAULT - NOT THE SYMPTOMS

User avatar
philhoward
RSSOC Member
Posts: 25338
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: Staffs, UK
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 642 times
Contact:

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by philhoward » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:39 pm

Jags had inboard rear discs on everything with IRS until the facelift XJS in the early 90’s but the P6 had it since introduction in 62-ish?

Even a 2CV has inboard front discs..


Phil Howard
Scimitarweb Forum Admin
SS1 1600 Rooster Turbo; Sabre Mk1.5, Sabre Mk2
Previous: SE5/5a/SS1 No.1/SS1 Rooster/SS1 1800Ti/SE5a 24 Valve
http://www.ss1turbo.com
Never try and argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you based on experience.

User avatar
CNHSS1
Posts: 14406
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:13 pm
Location: Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Has thanked: 377 times
Been thanked: 316 times
Contact:

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by CNHSS1 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:50 pm

Inboard discs put braking thrust loads into diff and transmissions, even on race cars with trans axles (Hewland boxes etc). Also outboard generally easier to cool.
A guy fitted inboard discs to a Sierra diff ( dead easy to do actually) but heat cooled diff bearings and oil so needed oil cooler and regular rebuilds.
Also on a car with reasonable power and weight, it does funny things under braking as the discs are braked but then theres the tolerance for the CV or UJ joints meaning you end with a lead and lag braking across the axle

Always liked the idea of trying on an ss1 but the rubber mounted diff would be an issue


Racing is life, everything before and after, is just waiting--Steve McQueen
6 time Class Champ, 2006 & 2014 SSSC Champion

RIP Batmobile, await the Rise of Dark Knight 8)
Sabre 'Light Sabre' 360hp!!
Image

drcdb15
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:28 am
Location: Sussex & Worcestershire
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by drcdb15 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:02 pm

Quite apart from practical issues such as line of sight for inspection and proximity to the outside for ease of access and maintenance, aren't there some theoretical reasons why in board brakes may not be such a good idea - such as if anything in the transmisson downstream of the brakes fails then the brakes may not stop the runaway vehicle which rather bypasses the primary objective. As I recall, weren't there truck brakes once that clamped curved brake shoes around the centre of the driveshaft to the rear wheels? Which was fine provided the diff etc held against the momentum of the vehicle. Not sure in the 40s and 50s that the materials were necessarily to be relied upon. If the aim is not so much to stop the vehicle as to stop the wheels from turning, then the closer you get to the wheel itself the better. Mind, I doubt this sort of argument applies to your typical tractor!


Chris
MB61; formerly 1978 SE6A 3.5 V8; 1986 SE6B 2.9 EFi.

User avatar
Roger Pennington
RSSOC Member
Posts: 20152
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:43 pm
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 538 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by Roger Pennington » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:08 pm

On "normal" road cars I think one of the big downsides with inboard discs has always been access and visibility, for routine maintenance? Tractors share with racecars, minimal bodywork and exposed internals, making access to things like inboard brakes much easier.


....Roger

RSSOC member (since 1982)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Image

"Condition can be bought at any time; Originality, once lost, is gone forever" - Doug Nye

User avatar
TrevorG
RSSOC Member
Posts: 479
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:09 am
Location: Thomas chapel in Pembrokeshire
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 25 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by TrevorG » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:31 pm

Sorry, shouldn't have overdone the in-board bit. My real emphasis was that tractors had disc brakes mid 50s!



User avatar
scimjim
RSSOC Member
Posts: 38146
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:08 pm
Location: Gloucester
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 1007 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by scimjim » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:35 pm

1902 Lanchester? I think it was mainly aircraft only until the Jaguar C-types in the 50s


Jim King

SECURE DRY STORAGE FOR YOUR SCIMITAR

Current: SE5 (8Ball), TI SS1 (snotty), 1600 SS1 (G97), 1600 SS1 (C686CCR), 2.5TD SE5a (diesel 5a), 6 x random other SS1s.
Previous: SE5, 3 x SE5a, 2 x SE6a, 3 x SE6b, GTC, 2.9i GTC, 3 x 1600 SS1, 1300 SS1, Mk1 Ti Sabre, Mk1.5 CVH Sabre
Chief mechanic for: 1400 K series SS1 (Megan3), 1400 CVH EFi SS1 (Grawpy), 1300 SS1 (Number One) & Sarah's coupe.
CURE THE FAULT - NOT THE SYMPTOMS

drcdb15
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:28 am
Location: Sussex & Worcestershire
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by drcdb15 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:33 pm

Roger Pennington wrote:
Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:08 pm
... exposed internals ...
Isn't that an oxymoron ? :) :w


Chris
MB61; formerly 1978 SE6A 3.5 V8; 1986 SE6B 2.9 EFi.

drcdb15
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:28 am
Location: Sussex & Worcestershire
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by drcdb15 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:36 pm

TrevorG wrote:
Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:31 pm
Sorry, shouldn't have overdone the in-board bit. My real emphasis was that tractors had disc brakes mid 50s!
I can never quite get my head around the fact that Lamborghini make tractors, and have done since 1948. Now I'm not surprised *they* had disc brakes ! :lol:


Chris
MB61; formerly 1978 SE6A 3.5 V8; 1986 SE6B 2.9 EFi.

User avatar
MickP
Posts: 1035
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:32 pm
Location: Montrose
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 10 times

Who says tractor engineering is agricultural

Post by MickP » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:49 pm

I sat my first driving test in a Lamborghini when I was aged 16 (a tractor, obviously :lol: ).
Lamborghini.jpg
Lamborghini.jpg (62.75 KiB) Viewed 788 times


SOLD: 1978 SE6a Auto.
1997 Ducati 900SS - Last carb. model.
SOLD: 1960 BSA Bantam D7 - more "fun" than the Ducati.
1998 Honda CG125 - great in slow traffic.
1981 Suzuki SB200 2-stroke twin - undergoing rebuild.
Gallery Project
“Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards.” - Aldous Huxley.

Post Reply

Return to “Other Car Chat”